![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Volume 25, No. 10 – October 2012Volume 25, No. 10 President’s Message I am so pleased that the Round Table is starting its twenty-sixth year. There will be nominations for officers in November. Please consider running and giving some time to the Round Table. It is always appreciated and will help the organization to continue being strong and vibrant. Gerridine LaRovere, President October 10, 2012 Assembly Our Speaker in October will be member William D. McEachern, Esq. (remembered as "Judge David Davis," the brains behind Abe Lincoln’s nomination in 1860). Bill will talk about his great great grandfather, who fought for the South as part of the Wade Hampton Legion, drawing upon diaries, letters and research to evoke what it must have been like to be a combatant in the Civil War. Wednesday, September 9, 2012 Program Mr. Stephen Singer’s varied career includes practicing defense law in New York City, being a case worker in New York City Department of Welfare, being an agent with the U.S. Treasury Department Intelligence Division, writing articles for Newsday in Queens, New York, teaching penology at St. Johns University, teaching trial practice at the West Palm Beach Public Defender’s Office, and lecturing on historical subjects and criminal law.
Lots of things were going on in 1876, the Centennial Year of the Declaration of Independence. The Northeastern U. S. was in the midst of an Industrial Revolution and urbanization. If the West was still "vacant" territory, it would not be so for long. According to the New York Morning Post it was America’s "Manifest Destiny" to possess the whole continent! A partial chronology of relevant incidents: January 31 -- the first Kindergarten class was held; February 1 -- the National "Baseball" League was organized; March 10 -- Alexander Graham Bell uttered those famous words, "Mr. Watson, come here, I want you" over the "telephone;" May 8 -- Wyatt Earp was appointed City Marshall of Dodge City, Kansas; May 10 -- the Centennial Exposition opened in Philadelphia; June 11 -- Rutherford B. Hayes was nominated by the Republican Convention; June 29 -- Samuel J. Tilden was nominated by the Democratic Convention; August 1 -- Colorado was admitted as the 38th state with three electoral votes; August 2 -- "Wild Bill" Hickok was shot in the back by Jack McCall while holding Aces and Eights (forever after called "the Dead Man’s Hand"); August 10 -- President Grant’s Secretary of War, William Belknap, who had been impeached in the House, was found "Not Guilty" in the Senate; and finally (shades of the 2000 election!), Democrat Tilden won the popular vote 50.1% to 47.9%, but Republican Hayes was awarded the 1876 election March 2, 1877, 185-184, by a special commission set up by Congress to allocate 20 disputed votes (four from Florida!), which gave all 20 to Hayes as part of a deal between the parties that ended Reconstruction. American history is full of disgraceful conduct toward the American Indians. The repudiation of solemn treaties and expressions of contempt for Indians were nothing new: In 1861, the United States "renegotiated" an 1851 treaty with seven Indian nations, leaving them with only 1/13th of their original territory. On November 29, 1864, Colorado militia led by Col. John Milton Chivington, massacred every man, woman and child of a group of "friendly" Indians camped at Sand Creek, Colorado. Asked, "Why kill the children?", the response was: "Nits make lice." The attitude of many Americans was brutally summed up by Col. Chivington: "Damn any man who sympathizes with Indians! ... I have come to kill Indians, and believe it is right and honorable to use any means under God's heaven to kill Indians." Gen. Philip Sheridan echoed this in 1869: "The only good Indian is a dead Indian."
Custer could not stand prosperity: in the 1870's, he intimated that he knew "something" involving President Grant’s daughter in an alleged scandal. From that moment Grant hated Custer. Not a "cool" career move! This time, William Tecumseh Sherman, Commanding General of the Army, came to his rescue. In 1876, while planning moves against the Indian "hostiles," Sherman told President Grant that Custer was one of the few men who knew how to fight Indians. Grant acceded to Sherman’s request, saying, "It’s your responsibility." The commander of the 7th Cavalry was reassigned in favor of Custer. Sherman probably had in mind Custer’s "victory" in the Battle of Wichita (also known as the "Wichita Massacre"). In the summer of 1868, Indians had raided white settlements in Kansas, Colorado, and Texas. Black Kettle was one of the few Indian chiefs who wanted peace with the whites. On November 27, 1868, Custer led a detachment that attacked his camp on the Wichita River, even though Black Kettle had come out waving both an American flag and a white flag! Black Kettle and his wife were shot in the back as they fled. Custer captured 53 women and children he intended to use as "human shields" to induce the Indians to surrender without a fight. Wrong! When the shooting ended, Custer claimed to have killed 103 Indian warriors (the Army later reported only 50 had been killed). Without Custer's approval, Maj. Joel Elliott pursued a group of fleeing Cheyenne, ran into a party of warriors rushing to aid Black Kettle's encampment, who killed in all 20 troopers, including Elliott. Custer's abrupt withdrawal from the field, without trying to determine Elliott’s fate, darkened Custer's reputation among his peers. Deep resentment within the 7th Cavalry never healed. In particular, Eliott's friend, Capt. Frederick Benteen, never forgave Custer, calling it a "dereliction of duty" to abandon Elliott and his troopers. Moreover, Maj. Marcus Reno also hated Custer for excluding him from his "in group" of his brother, Tom Custer, a nephew, and brother-in-law. In 1868, the United States entered into a solemn treaty with the Indians granting their sacred Black Hills in the Dakota Territory to the Indians "in perpetuity." In 1874, shortly after gold was discovered in the Black Hills, Custer led an expedition to the Black Hills, to "look for new forts." The fact that, against Army Regulations, he was accompanied by newspaper reporters and mining officials put the lie to that! In 1875, the Cheyenne and Sioux Indians were asked to "renegotiate" the 1868 Treaty. They were offered lots of American dollars but the Indians had no concept of money and rejected the offer. In reaction, in 1877, the Senate abrogated this treaty! [The United States Supreme Court, in U. S. v. Sioux Nations of Indians, 448 U. S. 371 (1980) at 372, held succinctly: "In 1877, Congress passed an Act (1877 Act) [that] in effect, abrogated the [1868] Treaty ... [and] effected a taking of tribal property which had been set aside by the Fort Laramie Treaty for the Sioux' exclusive occupation, which taking implied an obligation on the Government's part to make just compensation to the Sioux. That obligation, including an award of interest, must now be paid." The Sioux refused the money offered, and continue to this day to insist on their right to occupy the land!] The publicity following Custer’s expedition into the Black Hills led to a gold rush that threatened a new Indian War. For Custer, a new Indian War would lead to military glory and a political career. Custer was a self-promoter who designed his own uniforms and wore his golden hair long, earning the nickname from the Indians of "Long Hair." He (and especially his wife) wanted him to be President, and that was not beyond expectations – after all military heroes, from George Washington to U. S. Grant had done it.
Col. John Gibbons led six companies of infantry and four companies of cavalry east along the Yellowstone River. Brig. Gen. George Crook led 15 companies of cavalry and five companies of infantry toward the Powder River. Brig. Gen. Alfred Terry led 12 companies of cavalry under the direct command of Custer plus two companies of infantry and a battery of Gatling guns West toward the Powder River where he hooked up with Gibbon and a river boat. Each column employed numerous Indian scouts. Their routes are shown on the map below right. Were these "crack" troops? Hardly. After the Civil War, the American
public did not support a In additional poor planning, Custer decreed that the cavalry must leave its sabers behind for fear they would cause "too much noise" and alert the Indians! This meant that once the soldiers and troopers had shot their guns, there was no time to reload and the only weapon available for the resulting hand-to-hand combat were the rifle stocks. Custer also ordered that the Gatling guns be left behind as too cumbersome and noisy. Finally, he failed to have his troops carry entrenching tools that had been used in the Civil War. He also limited his force to 650-700 men, as "more than enough to fight the savages." On June 17, 1876, Crook’s column faced off on Rosebud Creek against a force of Cheyenne and Lakota braves estimated at between 600 and 1,700 strong. The battle was hard fought and Crook claimed victory, but in reality he was forced to return to his base camp at Goose Creek and therefore never hooked up with Custer. Terry and Gibbon marched South toward the Big Horn River. The
plan was for all three columns to Custer’s Indian scouts reported that the Indians ahead were too numerous for Custer to defeat by himself. True to his reckless character, Custer called them "cowards" and went to see for himself. At this moment someone dropped a crate of hardtack. A group of Indians quickly located it, but were chased off. By this time, Custer must have known he had lost any chance of surprise. The Indians knew he was there but did not believe he would be so stupid as to attack them. Custer pushed his men to an all-night march. Dawn found them exhausted, but Custer decided to attack. After all, how else could he get all the glory? He then divided his forces into three groups: Reno and Benteen were ordered to attack from the Southeast, while Custer "snuck" around to the North so he could attack from the Northwest. Reno, who may have been drunk, "lost" it when a scout next to him is hit in the head, splattering Reno with his blood and brains. Reno then issued confusing commands: "Dismount," Mount" and finally "Retreat," with every man for himself. He lost 33 men this way. Reno’s men straggled onto a hill (now called "Reno Hill"). "Benteen's column had been summoned by Custer's bugler with a hand-written message "Come, big village, be quick, bring packs" (ammunition), meaning that by this time Custer was most likely aware of the large numbers of Natives he was about to face. Benteen's coincidental arrival on the bluffs was just in time to save Reno's men from possible annihilation. "Despite hearing heavy gunfire from the north, including distinct volleys at 4:20 PM, ... Benteen concentrated on reinforcing Reno rather than continuing on toward Custer. Benteen's apparent reluctance to reach Custer prompted later criticism that he had failed to follow orders." [Wikipedia] (see map below).
The Battle of Little Big Horn could with justice be called the "Indians’ Last Stand." Congress quickly enlarged the size of the Army and reconstituted the 7th Cavalry, which exists today. By May 7, 1877, Gen. Nelson Miles had defeated the last Indian hostiles. Sitting Bull escaped to Canada, only to be assassinated on December 15, 1900, age 59. Crazy Horse surrendered and was killed on September 5, 1877, age 36. Mr. Singer then responded to many questions before receiving well-earned applause.
[Editor’s note: Seldom do I run across an article that opens my eyes to a facet of the Civil War that I never knew like the following extract of a column from The New York Times, September 22, 2012, by Yale Law Prof. John Fabian Witt, taken from his book, Lincoln’s Code: The Laws of War in American History.] "`How the Emancipation Proclamation Changed Modern Warfare New Haven -- On September 22, 1862 -- 150 years ago today -- Abraham Lincoln announced the Emancipation Proclamation, promising to free the slaves in any state still in rebellion on Jan. 1, 1863. Americans have celebrated Lincoln's proclamation and argued about its meaning, ever since. But there's a surprising legacy that few Americans know anything about, one that historians have overlooked. Emancipation touched off a crisis for the principle of humanitarian limits in wartime and transformed the international laws of war. In the crucible of emancipation, Lincoln created the rules that now govern soldiers around the world. Ever since 1775, when the royal governor of Virginia offered freedom to slaves who would turn against their revolutionary masters, American soldiers and statesmen held that freeing an enemy's slaves was anathema to civilized warfare. In the War of 1812, British raiders encouraged thousands of slaves to escape to freedom. For years, the American government pursued compensation from the British, contending that the laws of war protected slave owners from enemy depredations. The irony of a law that protected slave owners rather than slaves was not lost on European critics. But Americans argued that to seize an enemy's slaves was to make war on civilian economic resources. White Southerners further argued that arming an enemy's slaves invited terrible atrocities by freed people against their former masters... Southern whites reacted with fury. Jefferson Davis condemned it as barbaric and inhumane, and swore never to treat black Union soldiers as prisoners of war. Instead he promised to punish them and their white officers as criminals subject to enslavement or execution. The Union pledged to retaliate in turn. It soon seemed that efforts to limit war might collapse altogether. The South's threats forced the Union to state its position on the laws of war. In December 1862, Lincoln's General in Chief, Henry W. Halleck, at Lincoln’s behest, had Columbia professor Francis Lieber draft a pamphlet-length statement of the Union's view of the laws of war setting out humane rules prohibiting torture, protecting prisoners of war and outlawing assassinations. It distinguished between soldiers and civilians and it disclaimed cruelty, revenge attacks and senseless suffering. Most of all, the code defended freeing enemy slaves and arming black soldiers as a humanitarian imperative and not as an invitation to atrocity. And it insisted that the laws of war made "no distinction of color"--indeed, mistreatment of black soldiers would warrant righteous retaliation by the Union. The pocket-size pamphlet quickly became the blueprint for a new generation of international treaties, up to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. The code had been devised just as Lincoln abandoned what he called the "rose-water" tactics of the war's first year in favor of the much more aggressive strategy signaled by emancipation. And it set in motion the great paradox of the modern laws of war. The code arose out of the greatest moral triumph of modern political history emancipation-- and was aimed at limiting war's destruction. In a sense, the code succeeded: the feared terrors of a mass slave insurrection never came to pass. But by authorizing freedom, the new code also licensed a powerful and dangerous war strategy. It was a tool of the Union war effort. That is why the Lincoln administration issued it, and that is why the most powerful states in the European world signed on to versions of it in the decades that followed. The rules of armed conflict today arise directly out of Lincoln's example. They restrain brutality. But by placing a stamp of approval on "acceptable" ways to make war, they legitimate terrible violence. The law does not relieve war of all its terrors; it does not even purport to. But it stands as a living reminder, a century and a half later, of how thoroughly the United States' most significant moment still shapes our moral universe."
Last changed: 10/02/12 |