
The President’s Message:
There will be a
meeting on Wednesday, July 10, 2024.
However, there will be no meeting in
August or September.
I will be presenting
a program in July
Loudon Rangers and White’s Comanches.
They were independent cavalry units that ignored military rules
and regulations. Come to the
meeting and learn more about these raiders.
Gerridine La Rovere
June 12, 2024
Program:
Gerridine La Rovere gave the
presentation, The Story of the Official Records
It
is affectionately known as the “OR.”
The 128 volumes of the Official Records provide the most
comprehensive, authoritative, and exact reference on the Wars
operations. The “OR”
contains the eyewitness accounts of the veterans who fought on the
battlefields. However, they
are “often flawed sources - poorly written in some cases, lacking
perspective in others, frequently contradictory and occasionally even
self-serving.” Nevertheless,
they were compiled before publication of other literature on the subject
that, in several cases, caused some veterans to alter their memory and
perception of events later in life.
After the War veterans’ recollections were so varied that it was
hard to believe, “Was at the same battle.”
In spite of their limitations, most historians regard them as the
only full, accessible documentation of the War.
The “Official Records of the Union
and Confederate Armies in the War of the Rebellion” otherwise known as
the “Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies” or “Official
Records” or “OR” is the most extensive collection of Civil War land
warfare records available to the public.
It includes selected first- hand accounts, orders, reports, maps,
diagrams, and correspondence drawn from official records of the Northern
and Southern armies. The
official name of the War in the book title created controversy then and
today.
When finally published, the records
consisted of 138,579 pages and 1006 maps and diagrams assembled in 128
books. They were grouped as
70 volumes grouped in four series.
Series I- Military Operations,
included were formal reports, both Union and Confederate, the first
seizures of United States property in the southern states, and all
military operations in the field, with correspondence, orders, reports,
and returns Serial Nos. 1-111
Series II – Prisoners
Correspondence, orders, reports, and returns, Union and confederate
relating to prisoners of war and so far, as military authorities were
concerned to state or political prisoners.
Series III – Union Authorities
Correspondence, orders, reports and returns of the Union authorities
including their correspondence with Confederate officials not relating
to subjects in series I and II.
It includes the annual and special reports of the Secretary of
War, of the General-in-Chief and the chiefs of several staff corps and
departments; the calls for troops and the correspondence between the
National and several state authorities Serial Nos.122-126
Series IV- Confederate Authorities
correspondence, orders, reports, and returns of the Confederate
authorities, similar to the Union material in series III but excluding
correspondence between Union and Confederate authorities given in that
series. Serial Nos. 127-129
A final comprehensive index, Serial
No. 130, was published in 1901 with remaining additions and corrections.
A companion volume, The Atlas to Accompany the Official Records
of the Union and Confederate Armies, was published in 1895.
It included maps of the military operations (175 plates), a
topographic map of the area of operations (26 plates), and some drawings
of weapons, uniforms, insignia, and flags.
Documents printed in the “Official
Records, Armies” were copied directly into type from the originals by
the printers of the War Department printing bureau.
These printers had their trade’s long tradition of competence in
putting a manuscript together and correcting errors.
They may not have been academics who knew the scholarly
requirements for the reproduction of historical documents in print but,
they were aware of the problems involved and dealt with them
accordingly. They relied on
accepted shop practices, their rich experience, and commonsense.
A large part of the content had already been printed as
“preliminary prints” before the project received any proper editorial
direction. The sheer bulk of
the material involved prevented any complete review of the copying
process. There were errors
made that did not get noticed in the lists of errata.
Of course, printers’ errors occurred.
Many resulted from carelessness, difficulty in reading
handwriting, ignorance in spelling proper names, and lack of familiarity
with geographical names.
The documents were printed a second
time from the preliminary prints that were at the Government Printing
Office. It is amazing that
there are not more mistakes in the transcription.
Given the enormous volume of
material, the lengthy time period of collection and publication, and the
continuing correction by veterans on both sides, the records are said to
be the most peer-reviewed documents.
Historians have argued that some of the modifications made years
after the events decreased their accuracy and were made to enhance or
denigrate reputations.
An additional 100 volumes of
previously unpublished reports and correspondence were printed by the
Broadfoot Publishing company of Wilmington, North Carolina from 1995 to
1999. These volumes are
entitled “Supplement to the Official Records of the Union and
Confederate Armies.” The
company is still in business and publishes and sells books about
history.
How did the Official Records come to
be collected and printed?
The initial idea for publishing the “OR” came from General Henry Wager
Halleck. He was known before
the War as “Old Brains.” He
was a competent organizer and administrator but not a good field
officer. The General
preferred an indoor office not an outdoor tent.
Overwhelmed by the task of writing his 1863 report to Congress,
Halleck recommended to the Committee on Military Affairs that official
documents and reports relating to the War be collected and published.
Republican Senator Henry Wilson of
Massachusetts who was chairman of the Committee on Military Affairs,
introduced a Joint Resolution “to provide for the printing of the
official reports of the armies of the United States,” the House and
Senate adopted the resolution on May 19,1864.
The law to collect Union Army records was signed by President
Lincoln on May 20, 1864.
After the fall of Richmond, Halleck
ordered Confederate papers to be gathered and sorted.
Many documents were destroyed as the city burned.
However, 500 boxes, hogsheads, and barrels of Confederate papers
reached the War Department by August.
Historians owe a gratitude to
Halleck. During the War he
prevented destruction of captured Confederate records.
After the War he spent his own money to see that these documents
were properly preserved and published.
The original intent in keeping all
the documents, Union and Confederate, was to allow officers to write
their memoirs. Work began
immediately after the bill passed and was signed in1864.
However, there were many delays and Congress passed a law in 1866
calling for effective organization, development of long-range plans, and
cost estimates. The project
came to a halt again for lack of leadership.
Lobbying by Union and Confederate
veteran organizations restarted the project.
In 1874, Congress appropriated funds to pay for the publication
of Army records. By 1877,
thirty-seven preliminary volumes of Union documents and ten of
Confederate were generated.
All material was in chronological order not by campaigns or battles.
Seeing that the results to date were
not satisfactory, the War Department appointed a full-time curator in
1877. Colonel Robert N.
Scott had been aide-de-camp to Halleck during and after the War.
He was the right person for this position.
Scott was familiar with military bureaucracy and the “records
management” practices of their offices.
Scott made two important decisions.
First, he specified that records would be organized topically –
by campaign or battle. Union
reports would be followed by Confederate and were to be placed together
for a connected account. In
the same volume related correspondence in chronological order would
follow the reports. This was
a critical decision for historical research.
Second, Scott established criteria
for selecting meaningful documents.
Not only must the document be official and significant, it had to
be generated during the War and no more than a month or so after the
event. He realized that
human memory is unreliable after time passes.
There were disputes but they were
not significant. The most
controversial policy was over the issue of wartime production.
Scott believed that unaltered documents revealed leaders’
knowledge and unclear assessment of the situation at the time of action.
Historians and veterans could better understand the basis for
wartime decisions in the heat of battle.
Therefore, there were to be no after the fact corrections or
alterations to the original documents.
Many veterans that were officers tried to make postwar
corrections that could significantly alter their
actions in the field.
Scott and later editors did permit certain annotations such as
notes vindicating individuals by postwar commissions.
Corrections were allowed for misspellings and terrible grammar.
In
order to promote impartiality Scott employed Union and Confederate
former officers. The job was
daunting to say the least.
The papers to be compiled were not by documents or boxes but by tons,
roomfuls, and building contents.
Every document was authenticated as much as possible.
This required time-consuming research and correspondence by a
staff that numbered six officers and sixty-nine clerks.
There has never been serious questioning of the authenticity of
the vast majority of the material collected and published.
With Scott in charge, the government
had clearly found the best man for that position.
He was qualified and dedicated to the task.
He supervised the first eighteen volumes.
The first volume was distributed in 1881.
When Scott died in 1887, a succession of editors continued the
process until 128 volumes were completed.
The project took thirty-seven years and $3,000,000.00 (in today’s
dollars $96,973,608.25).
That was quite a bargain price!
In 1903, after eleven thousand sets were published and
distributed, the plates were destroyed by law.
All modern editions are facsimiles.
Alan and Barbara Aimones created a
handy book called “A User’s Guide to the Official Records of the
American Civil War.” I
thought that this book was probably published in 1910 or there abouts
but I was wrong. It was
first published in December of 1992.
Alan is employed by the U.S. Military Academy Library.
The Aimones state, “No research about the American Civil War can
be complete without using the Official Records.”
Last changed: 07/03/24 |