The President’s Message:
I am so pleased to announce that the Civil
War Round Table of the Palm Beaches has a new location for our meetings.
Harold Teltser has worked very
hard to secure a wonderful new meeting place.
His efforts are greatly are
appreciated.
Starting Wednesday, October 10th
at 7:00 PM the Round Table will meet at the Atlantis Council Chambers,
160 Orange Tree Drive, Atlantis 33462.
Directions from I-95 and Lantana Road:
1.
Exit on Lantana Road and go west on Lantana Road for 1.5 miles.
2.
Turn right onto South Congress Avenue 0.4 mile.
3.
Turn left onto Clubhouse Blvd. 0.3 mile.
4.
There is a guardhouse. However,
you do not need to show identification. Simply wave and the guard
will open the gate. If you do need further directions for the Council
Chamber, please ask the guard.
5.
Turn right on Orange Tree Drive. Destination is the white building
immediately on corner. Pull into parking lot.
Directions from US441 and Lantana Road:
1.
Go east on Lantana Road 6.9 miles.
2.
Turn left onto South Congress Avenue 0.4 mile
3.
Turn left onto Clubhouse Blvd. 0.3 mile.
4.
There is a guardhouse. However,
you do not need to show identification. Simply wave and the guard
will open the gate. If you do need further directions for the Council
Chamber, please ask the guard.
5.
Turn right on Orange Tree Drive. Destination is the white building
immediately on corner. Pull into parking lot.
October 10, 2018 Program:
Is the name Mudd still a dirty word? Janell
Bloodworth will talk about Dr. Samuel A. Mudd.
The second half of the program Gerridine LaRovere will discuss
Anna Elizabeth Dickinson, the highest paid female orator on the
political circuit. Her spoken
words assured a Republican victory in Connecticut in 1863.
August 8, 2018 Program:
Marshall Krolick gave us a presentation titled
The Boy Generals: The Promotion of Custer, Merritt, and Farnsworth.
During the early morning hours of June 28, 1863 Joseph Hooker was
relieved as commander of the Army of the Potomac and George Gordon Meade
was appointed to replace him. This occurred while the army was at
Fredericksburg, Maryland during a critical stage in the campaign which
would culminate at Gettysburg. Less
than twelve hours later, also on June 28, 1863, Meade sent the following
telegram to General-in-Chief Henry W. Halleck:
"To
June 28, 1963
Halleck, Major General
To organize with efficiency the cavalry force now with this army, I
require three Brigadier Generals. General Pleasonton nominates Captain
Farnsworth, 8th Illinois Cavalry, Captain (sic) George A. Custer, 5th
U.S. Cavalry, Captain Wesley Merritt, 2nd U.S. Cavalry. Can these
officers be appointed?
Meade
Major General Commanding"
Without waiting for a response, Meade issued the following order on that
same day:
"SPECIAL ORDERS,) HEADQUARTERS ARMY OF THE POTOMAC,
No. 175. )
Frederick, MD., June 28, 1863
The following-named general officers are assigned to duty with the
Cavalry Corps, and will report to Major-General Pleasonton:
Brigadier-General Farnsworth, U.S. Volunteers; Brig. Gen. George A.
Custer, U.S. Volunteers; Brig. Gen. Wesley Merritt, U.S. Volunteers………
By command of Major-General Meade:
S. WILLIAMS,
Assistant Adjutant-General."
In fact, the Commissions sought were granted on June 29, 1863.
So the lives and fates of three young officers, two captains and a first
lieutenant, were unalterably changed by one of the most unusual
promotions in the history of the United States Army. These promotions
can be readily understood if they had been made for cause, such as for
great deeds, for battlefield bravery, for exhibited qualities of
leadership, or for brilliant strategic and tactical ability. To
determine if that was the case here, the lives and careers of the
promoted officers up to June, 1863 must be examined.
Captain
Wesley Merritt was born on June 16, 1836 in New York City, but spent
most of his early life in Illinois. Appointed to West Point, he
graduated twenty-second out of forty-one in the class of 1860 and was
commissioned a lieutenant in the 2nd Dragoons. Subsequently, Merritt
served in Utah where one of his superiors was then Captain Alfred
Pleasonton. After the outbreak of the Civil War, he marched back east
with his regiment and, by February of 1862, Merritt was serving as
aide-de-camp to Philip St. George Cooke, the commander of the Federal
cavalry during the Peninsula Campaign. For the balance of that year he
served as a staff officer in the Washington defenses. In the Spring of
1863, just prior to the Chancellorsville Campaign, he became an
aide-de-camp to George Stoneman. At one point during the fiasco that has
come to be known as Stoneman's Raid, Merritt commanded a detachment
which was successful in burning bridges over the South Anna River and
destroying railroad facilities. In late May, he renewed his relationship
with Alfred Pleasonton by becoming an aide-de-camp on the latter's
staff. However, early June found Merritt back with his old regiment, now
known as the 2nd U.S. Cavalry, which he commanded at the Battle of
Brandy Station. A contemporary described Merritt at this time as
reticent, almost shy, but an old army type in that he was a tough
disciplinarian, almost a martinet.
Capt.
Elon J. Farnsworth was born July 30, 1837 in Green Oak, Michigan. His
early life was spent in Michigan and then in Rockton, Illinois. In 1855
Farnsworth enrolled at the University of Michigan, but in 1858 he and
several others were expelled for what was described as a "drunken
escapade". Almost immediately he joined Albert Sidney Johnston's Mormon
Campaign as a civilian forage master. After the Civil War began, he
returned to Illinois to become a first lieutenant and adjutant in the
8th Illinois Cavalry, a regiment raised in the summer of 1861 by his
uncle, John Farnsworth, a former Republican congressman. In December he
was promoted to captain of Company K. Mule the regiment was quartered in
Alexandria, Virginia in the winter of 1861-1862 Elon is reported to have
physically pulled from the pulpit an Episcopal rector who had omitted
from his service the normal prayer for the President of the United
States. In the spring of 1863, Farnsworth joined the staff of Alfred
Pleasonton. A description of Elon Farnsworth at this time by James Kidd,
future colonel of the 6th Michigan Cavalry, pictured him as proud,
ambitious and fiery, yet poised and discreet, a man true as steel to his
country and to his convictions of duty and manhood.
First
Lieutenant George Armstrong Custer was born on December 5, 1839 in Ohio
and spent his early years in Monroe, Michigan. At West Point he was
ranked last in the class of 1861, a standing achieved partly because of
the excessive time he spent under detention because of rules violations.
His first assignments during the Civil War were as an aide on the staffs
of Winfield Scott and George B. McClellan. By May 15, 1863 he had been
appointed to the staff of Alfred Pleasonton, the new commander of the
cavalry corps of the Army of the Potomac. In this capacity he rode with
John Buford at the Battle of Brandy Station and there helped to rally
the brigade of Grimes Davis after the latter's death early in the
battle. A description of Custer is certainly unnecessary, but among the
words which come automatically to mind are impetuous, flamboyant, brave,
and vain.
Thus, as the armies rested after Chancellorsville, an evaluation of
Merritt, Farnsworth and Custer would cite to jobs well done, but
certainly not to careers of great distinction. Their performance, while
commendable, was not any different from that of hundreds of other
officers. In fact, such veteran colonels of the Cavalry Corps of the
Army of the Potomac as John McIntoch, William Gamble, George Chapman,
Henry Davies and others could certainly expect promotion before junior
grade staff and line officers. Yet, on June 28, 1863 these three young
men were jumped from captain and first lieutenant to brigadier general
and thus the obvious question is "why?" The answer clearly was not based
on accomplishment or proven ability. That fact was confirmed by Custer
himself. In a confidential letter written July 26, 1863 to his close
friend and patron, Judge Christiancy of Monroe, Michigan, Custer
expressed surprise.
Rather, the reasons for these unprecedented promotions are to be found
in the deeds and minds of others, as a result of ambition, desire for
power, bigotry and political intrigue. In fact, the three promoted
officers were but pawns in a much larger game. To examine those
circumstances two other individuals must be introduced to the cast of
characters.
The
first is John Farnsworth, uncle of Elon. Born in Quebec, Canada on March
27, 1820, he spent his early life in Ann Arbor, Michigan as a surveyor.
In 1842 he relocated to St. Charles, Illinois and opened a law practice.
Ten years later, in 1852, he moved his office to Chicago where he became
a friend of Abraham Lincoln and quickly established a reputation as a
virulent Lovejoy abolitionist. On that platform, and as a Republican, he
was elected to Congress from Chicago in 1856 and again in 1858. However,
by 1860 the political climate had moderated in his district as people of
reason sought a less strident representative in an effort to avoid war.
Thus John Farnsworth was defeated that year for renomination and he
returned to his law practice in Chicago.
As did many politicians and men of prominence during the summer of 1861,
in response to President Lincoln's call for troops John Farnsworth
raised a regiment, the 8th Illinois Cavalry. He became its colonel and
his nephew Elon was appointed a lieutenant. When the regiment moved to
Washington in September, 1861, it was personally reviewed by the
President, who referred to it as "Farnsworth's big abolition regiment".
During the first year of the war, the 8th Illinois and its colonel
performed adequately, if unspectacularly. However, by Antietam Uncle
John was in command of a cavalry brigade in the division led by Alfred
Pleasonton. On November 29, 1862, John Farnsworth was commissioned a
brigadier general of volunteers, but that same month he had been
re-elected to Congress. On April 4, 1863 he took his seat, resigning his
army commission that same day. The fifth and final piece of the puzzle
is in fact the prime mover of the entire scenario. He is a man whose
name has already been associated with each of the other members of our
cast of characters. That man, referred to by historian Edward Long acre
as "The Knight of Romance" is, of course, Alfred Pleasonton. He was born
in Washington, D.C. on July 7, 1824 and graduated from West Point in
1844, ranking seventh out of twenty-five. He saw service in the Mexican
War, on the frontier, and in the campaign against the Seminoles. By
1860, Pleasonton was a captain in the 2nd United States Dragoons,
serving in Utah where Wesley Merritt was a lieutenant and Elon
Farnsworth was a civilian forage master. In the fall of 1861 he was
ordered to march the regiment back to Washington and he served with it
that winter in the Washington defenses. Promoted to major on February
15, 1862, he saw action during the Peninsula Campaign. On July 16, 1862,
Pleasonton was appointed a brigadier general of volunteers and during
the Antietam and Chancellorsville Campaigns he commanded a cavalry
division. At Antietam one of his brigades was led by John Farnsworth. In
early June, 1863, Pleasonton replaced George Stoneman as commander of
the cavalry corps of the Army of the Potomac and was in command of all
Federal troops on the field at the Battle of Brandy Station on June 9th.
Descriptions
of Alfred Pleasonton in the writings of his contemporaries often include
such favorable terms as professionally competent, self-confident, and an
able strategist and battlefield tactician. However, these are more than
offset by the negative references, which include ambitious, desirous of
power, vain, swaggering, overly concerned with his reputation and, most
damning of all, an unprincipled liar, as witness his report of Brandy
Station. In dress, he was a dandy, affecting fancy uniforms, a jaunty
mustache, gauntlets, and a riding whip. To complete the picture, his
relationship with the three young officers must be reviewed. At least
two, his then current staff officers, Custer and Elon Farnsworth,
regarded Pleasonton as a father figure, even to emulating his manner of
dress.
That Custer returned this affection is evidenced by his gift to Alfred
Pleasonton, in the spring of 1863, of a magnificent horse captured from
a Confederate officer. As for Wesley Merritt, he had served directly
under Pleasonton several times, including a short stint as aide-de-camp.
Both Custer and Merritt had been previously recommended for promotion by
Pleasonton. Last, but certainly not least, Elon Farnsworth was John
Farnsworth's nephew and by June, 1863 John Farnsworth had become a most
important man in Alfred Pleasonton's life. It was through the elder
Farnsworth that Pleasonton hoped to accomplish what he wanted most in
life at this time. These goals were: (1) promotion to major general; (2)
an increase in the size of the Cavalry Corps, thereby making his command
more important; (3) the appointment of subordinate commanders personally
loyal to him so as to solidify his power base; and (4) elimination of
foreigners from his command.
The last of these desires resulted from the fact that Alfred Pleasonton
was a bigot, prejudiced against anyone not a native born American. He
regarded all foreigners as inept mercenaries. To illustrate this, among
his writings of this period can be found statements such as "In every
instance foreigners have injured our cause". When Alfred Pleasonton
assumed command of the Cavalry Corps, Europeans such as Sir Percy
Wyndham, Luigi Di Cesnola and Alfred Duffie held important commands. In
every instance, by the end of the Gettysburg campaign they were gone. In
several cases these removals were for unjust cause fostered by
Pleasonton.
However, in June of 1863, those gentlemen were not Pleasonton's prime
target among the foreign born. That distinction belonged to an
unfortunate Hungarian, Brigadier General Julius Stahel. This poor soul
not only was a foreigner, but had the misfortune to be in command of a
cavalry division, containing thirty-six hundred troopers, attached to
the defenses of Washington. Alfred Pleasonton not only instinctively
disliked Stahel because of the latter's foreign birth, but he also
coveted Stahel's division as an addition to his cavalry corps. Thus
communiques began to descend on Washington from Pleasonton's
headquarters criticizing Stahel's performance and cooperation, although
in fact at this time Stahel's troopers were providing better
intelligence of Confederate movements than was Pleasonton.
To support his desire to populate the command structure of the cavalry
corps with his own people, Alfred Pleasonton also resorted in June, 1863
to his always prolific, if not always truthful, pen. For example, his
report of the Battle of Upperville, fought on June 21, stated: "Give me
good commanders and I will give you good results".
However, above all, Alfred Pleasonton was a realist and a veteran
observer of the politics of Washington. He knew letters alone would not
accomplish his four goals. He needed a friend in court, a powerful
political voice with the ear of Lincoln and the Radical Republican
leadership of Congress. Fortunately, Pleasonton knew just where to turn,
to his good friend and former subordinate, the Radical Republican
congressman, the friend of Lincoln, John Farnsworth. Already Pleasonton
had cemented their relationship by appointing Elon Farnsworth to his
staff. In addition, Pleasonton and John Farnsworth had become regular
correspondents since John Farnsworth left the army. Now Alfred
Pleasonton peppered his letters to John Farnsworth with criticisms of
Stahel, suggestions that the latter's division belonged with the Army of
the Potomac, pleas that Pleasonton should be allowed to appoint his own
officers, and queries why he as a corps commander was not a major
general.
The schemes of Alfred Pleasonton reached their
finest hour on June 23, 1863 when he wrote a letter, marked "private",
to John Farnsworth.
It was full of venom directed at
Stahel.
Not content with his own words, Alfred
Pleasonton added the coup-de-gras. Enclosed with the letter to John was
a note from nephew Elon:
"Pleasonton is still not a Major
General. While Pleasonton has fought thru 3 severe battles, all this
time Stahel has four or five thousand cavalry in and about Washington
just doing nothing at all. Trains passing between here and Fairfax C.H.
are burned by Bushwhackers, our dispatches intercepted and yet Stahel
does nothing. Now if you can do anything to get the cavalry consolidated
and Stahel left out, for Gods sake do it. You hardly know or can imagine
the bitter feeling that exists among the officers of the cavalry towards
Stahel and those who are trying to set him and other Dutchmen up, Duffie
has failed on two occasions. The Gen'l. speaks of you can do are
commending me for Brig. I do not know that I ought to mention it for
fear that you will call me an aspiring youth. I am satisfied to serve
through this war in the line in my Reg't as a Capt. or on Gen'l
Pleasonton's staff. But if I can do any good anywhere else of course
'small favors and etc.' now try and talk all this into the President and
do an immense good...
"Since these letters were written
from the area of Aldie, only fifty miles from Washington, it can
certainly be assumed that they reached John Farnsworth by the 25th, if
not on the 24th. In determining the result of this and the other
Pleasonton correspondence, an examination of the events of the next few
days proves very interesting. On June 24, 1863, Alfred Pleasonton was
nominated to the Senate for confirmation as a Major General. On June 28,
Custer, Merritt and Farnsworth, Pleasonton's personal choices, were
promoted to brigadier general. On that same day Julius Stahel was
relieved from the command of his division. Also on June 28, Stahel's
former division was added to the Cavalry Corps of the Army of the
Potomac, giving Alfred Pleasonton a total force of over twelve thousand
men. Thus, four goals had been set and four goals had been achieved.
The reaction of the three promoted officers was clearly
revealed by how they handled the change of uniform in the midst of a
volatile campaign. Merritt, quiet and understated, simply continued to
wear what he had until he could obtain a proper general's uniform. Elon
Farnsworth, fiery and dashing, borrowed a general's trappings from
Alfred Pleasonton, whose dress he already was copying. And then there
was George A. Custer. It is perhaps best to let Major James Kidd of the
6th Michigan Cavalry describe Custer's self-designed new attire when the
latter arrived to assume his new command:
"my eyes were instantly riveted upon a figure only a few feet distant,
whose appearance amazed if it did not for the moment amuse me. . . He
was clad in a suit of black velvet, elaborately trimmed with gold lace,
which ran down the outer seams of his trousers, and almost covered the
sleeves of his cavalry jacket. The wide collar of a blue navy shirt was
turned down over the collar of his velvet jacket, and a necktie of
brilliant crimson was tied in a graceful knot at the throat, the long
ends falling carelessly in front. The double rows of buttons on his
breast were arranged in groups of twos, indicating the rank of brigadier
general…" It went on from
there. Another contemporary
description, perhaps a touch more critical, stated that Custer's attire
made him look like "a circus rider gone mad." "Three dashing and
brilliant young officers, who have been appointed in violation of red
tape and regardless of political influence because of their rare fitness
to lead cavalry."
In any event, the promotions were made and duly confirmed.
The three officers, regardless of the style of uniform they adopted,
reported to their new commands. For Merritt, it was back to his old
command, as he took over the Reserve Brigade, officially the Third
Brigade of Buford's First Division. This division was assigned to lead
the left front of the Federal advance into Maryland and Pennsylvania.
Stahel's former division was designated as a new Third Division and
divided into two brigades. The first was given to Elon Farnsworth and
the second to George Custer. The latter brigade, consisting of the 1st,
5th, 6th, and 7th Michigan Cavalry regiments, would become famous under
Custer's leadership as the "Michigan Brigade". The new commander of this
third division was Judson Kilpatrick. Rash, foolish and reckless,
without tactical or strategic ability, he would quickly earn his
nickname, "Kill Cavalry". Unfortunately the "cavalry" referred to was
usually his own, not the enemy's.
On July 3rd at Gettysburg, on the eastern edge of the
town, Gregg's Second Division, aided materially by Custer's brigade,
dueled Stuart as the latter attempted to gain the Federal rear. The key
moment in this too often neglected action was the mounted charge of the
1st Michigan, personally led by George Custer, against the advance of
the troops of Wade Hampton and Fitz Lee. This, of course, was the famous
"C'mon you Wolverines" incident and it, and the way Custer handled his
brigade generally, played an important role in Stuart's defeat.
Later that same afternoon, as the remnants of the divisions
of Pickett, Pettigrew and Trimble were streaming back to Seminary Ridge,
another cavalry charge was mounted, this time on the southern edge of
the field and with tragically different results. The idiotic Judson
Kilpatrick had decided that the Army of Northern Virginia was
demoralized after its repulse. Thus he ordered Elon Farnsworth to make a
mounted charge against the Confederate right, the divisions of Hood and
McLaws, posted in the south end of the Devil's Den area, west of Big
Round Top. This was an area of woods, fences, huge boulders, and broken
ground, certainly no place for a cavalry attack. Upon Kilpatrick's
orders for this suicidal charge, a Federal officer heard the following
exchange between Kilpatrick and Elon Farnsworth:
"Farnsworth: "General, do you mean it? Shall I throw my
handful of men over rough ground, through timber, against a brigade of
infantry? The First Brigade has already been fought half to pieces;
these are too good men to kill." Kilpatrick countered with the age-old
charge: "Do you refuse to obey my orders? If you are afraid to lead this
charge I will lead it." "Take that back!", Farnsworth shouted as he rose
in his stirrups, his wrath blazing out of control. As Kilpatrick
apologized the quarrel died down and Farnsworth said: "General, if you
order the charge I will lead it, but you must take the responsibility."
When the attack began, Farnsworth and his men soon found
themselves riding a gauntlet between two Confederate lines. As the
troopers desperately sought an escape route, Elon Farnsworth was killed,
his body pierced by five bullets. The reaction of Alfred Pleasonton when
he heard of Farnsworth's death was to say "Nature made him a general".
One can only wonder at the reaction of John Farnsworth, whose
machinations with Alfred Pleasonton, not nature, had resulted in the
promotion and subsequent death of his nephew.
As for Wesley Merritt, his assigned role on the Army's far
left flank resulted in two other clashes on July 3rd. Badly outnumbered,
one of his regiments, the 6th U.S., fought unsuccessfully at Fairfield
against the cavalry guarding the Confederate trains. Later that day,
just prior to Farnsworth's charge the remainder of Merritt's brigade
battled Confederate infantry in an inconclusive action along the
Emmitsburg Road.
So the Gettysburg Campaign ended and the actors on our stage
went on to play out the roles in life that fate, and Alfred Pleasonton,
had dealt them. For Alfred Pleasonton himself it was not to be a happy
road, certainly not the one he had envisioned. By the spring of 1864,
Meade had had enough of him. Pleasonton's testimony before the Committee
on the Conduct of the War had supported Hooker, Butterfield, and Birney
in their attacks against Meade. Also, Pleasonton's lies were catching up
with him. Thus, when Grant brought Sheridan east with him, Meade was
more than happy to let Alfred Pleasonton go. He was relieved from
command of the Cavalry Corps on March 25, 1864. Banished to Missouri, he
performed extremely well during Price's Raid and the balance of the war,
but it was an arena without an audience. On the reorganization of the
army in 1866 he declined an infantry command. However, his regular army
rank was still only major of the 2nd U.S. Cavalry. Incensed that this
left him subordinate in the regiment to those he had ranked during the
war, he resigned. For thirty years he lived out a lonely life in
Washington, holding minor government jobs for his livelihood. Alfred
Pleasonton died on February 17, 1897. His bitter memories of his career
in the army are best reflected by the fact that no reference to his
military service appears on his tombstone.
As for the three young men whose careers Pleasonton's
ambition had so profoundly affected, Elon Farnsworth of course was dead,
forgotten today except for a restaurant in Gettysburg bearing his name
and a monument over his grave in Rockton, Illinois. Custer's career
needs no retelling here, except to emphasize that in 1864 and 1865 he
performed brilliantly as a cavalry leader. Quiet, unassuming Wesley
Merritt went on to enjoy one of the most distinguished careers in the
history of the United States Army. His regular army promotions included
colonel in 1876, brigadier general in 1887 and major general in 1895.
For a period of time he served as Superintendent of West Point, and
later commanded the forces in Philippines during the Spanish American
War. Retiring in 1900, Merritt died in 1910 and was buried at West
Point, near the grave of Custer.
So as a result of the ambition and conniving of Alfred
Pleasonton, the lives of these three young men touch such diverse places
as the foot of Big Round Top at Gettysburg, the Little Big Horn in
Montana, and Manilla in the Philippines. One can only wonder where Elon
Farnsworth, Wesley Merritt and George Custer would have gone and how
different their lives might have been if they had not been pawns in the
manipulations of Alfred Pleasonton.
Last Changed: 09/26/18
|